alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
                                                                                                   
 
 V.21 No.52 | December 27 - January 2, 2013 

Flash in the Pan

Pro-Gun, Anti-NRA

Why hunters should stand against the nation’s largest firearm association

 
 

The National Rifle Association claims to be the largest pro-hunting organization in the world. But as a hunter, the NRA couldn't represent me less. And as a human being, I object to being associated with those bullies. The NRA is not for hunters any more than AAA is for bicyclists. In 2011, nearly 14 million Americans hunted, while NRA members number about four million, fewer than half of whom actually hunt. First and foremost the NRA serves gun fetishists and the firearms industry.

Unlike a lot of gun owners, hunters actually use their guns as the killing tools that they are. I don't shoot for the joy of killing or for the thrill of a loud explosion an inch from my head. The gun is not a toy that we have a constitutional right to play with, but a tool to which we're guaranteed access.

While most hunters don't have the firearms experience or training of law enforcement or military personnel, a hunter's experience imparts a significant level of competence with a gun. Hunters feel the jitters while trying to shoot, and shoot in all kinds of uncomfortable and less than ideal circumstances. We've seen what bullets can do to a body. We can contemplate, in an informed way, questions like how or if an armed civilian might stop a mass murder. And if for some reason a non-government militia had to be organized, it would doubtless be composed largely of hunters, along with military veterans and, of course, the gun freaks.

The NRA wants desperately to welcome more hunters into its ranks, but fewer than one in five hunters are members, and most who haven't joined by now probably won't. Like me, many hunters consider the NRA a bunch of paranoid loonies, with an increasing volume of innocent blood on their hands.

When I say "Fuck the NRA," as I do quite often lately, it's for a host of reasons both personal and political, but has nothing to do with my feelings for guns or the 2nd amendment.

The very fact that it's kind of scary to say "Fuck the NRA" is one of the biggest reasons to say it. It's a bullying organization, quick to use language like "traitor." NRA members have a lot of guns, and the organization appears to keep track of who does and says what. Ask any politician or gun-control activist. The Big Brother style intimidation tactics extend to individual hunters like myself.

When I take my gun to the store to get it worked on, the information slip I fill out includes a line for my NRA number. Will the gunsmith treat my gun with less love if I leave that line blank? Does the NRA keep track of who services which gun when, even as it decries federal attempts to keep track of guns? I face the same blank field requesting my NRA number when I buy a membership at my local shooting range. Some ranges won't sell membership to non-NRA shooters.

Among Americans with experience using guns as weapons, rather than as toys, compare 14 million hunters with 3 million active and reserve military, and nearly a million police officers. Of course, there is some crossover among these groups. And again, hunters have the least amount of formal firearms training. But in terms of votes, any way you slice it, there is no larger population of Americans with experience shooting at things than hunters. The NRA doesn't speak for us; we need to speak for ourselves.

If fewer than one in five hunters is an NRA member, how is it that the NRA has so much power, and the seeming ability to control politicians like marionettes? Money, of course. More than can be raised from membership dues and bake sales alone. According to the Violence Policy Center, between 2005 and 2010, the NRA took in about $40 million from the nation's gun manufacturers.

Fear mongering is one of the best ways to create demand for guns, and nearly every piece of NRA propaganda does that. We need guns to protect us from the government, the UN, home intruders, strangers on the street. We all need to be armed! And it works: on the Monday following the Sandy Hook shootings, a Utah sixth-grader took a pistol to elementary school, for "protection."

Obama's reelection has been an absolute bonanza for the industry. But he can't get reelected again, despite what the conspiracy theorists might tell you. That reality, combined with the unprecedented national trauma and soul-searching that Sandy Hook has inspired, could spell tough times ahead for the gun industry. Stock in publicly traded gun manufacturers like Ruger, which makes my hunting rifle, have been punished since Sandy Hook.

On the Tuesday after the shooting, Cerberus Capitol Management announced it was selling its 95 percent stake in The Freedom Group, a privately held conglomerate whose companies include some of the world's largest weapons manufacturers, including Remington, Barnes bullets and Bushmaster, which makes the AR-15 assault rifle used by Adam Lanza.

Could a hunter or some other armed citizen have prevented the Sandy Hook shootings? Such a thing has not happened in at least 30 years, according to a recent study by Mother Jones, which looked at 62 mass shootings over the past three decades, "In not a single case was the killing stopped by a civilian using a gun ... in recent rampages in which armed civilians attempted to intervene, they not only failed to stop the shooter but also were gravely wounded or killed."

Meanwhile, a growing body of evidence supports the observation that gun owners and their families are more likely to be shot by their own guns than to successfully repel attackers with them. In pretending otherwise, the NRA is selling the myth of security while it sells public safety down the river.

The NRA needs hunters a lot more than hunters need the NRA. And the nation needs the opinions of hunters more than it needs the opinion of the NRA. Hunters are intermediaries between government armed forces and private citizens. We are armed citizens, who know what guns can do, and if sensible gun-control policy is ever to be pursued, hunters need to be part of the conversation.

And we can start by saying "Fuck the NRA."

Public Comments (12)
  • Fuck the hunters too!  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 11:20 AM ]

    Most hunters don't belong to the NRA for the same reason most folks don't belong to the ACLU; they like what they do, but don't want to pay the dues.

    We will all be safest when all the guns are gone, and that means hunting guns too. Nobody needs to kill to eat. Add it all up, it's cheaper, and safer for you and everybody else outdoors, to buy your meat at the store. If you need the thrill and challenge, use a bow and bounce rubber arrows off the game.

    The NRA would like to have you Nimrods and your money, but they do not need you as much as you think. There are 80 million gun owners, and only 14 million hunters. More than two out of three, about 54 million, say they own guns primarily for protection, not hunting.

    The Mother Jones "study" is BS. If a shooter was stopped before they killed enough victims for the incident to qualify as a "mass" shooting they don't count it, and they should. They missed more than a few anyway. The man and woman who stopped shootings at their churches, the teacher who stopped a shooting at his school, and the janitor who stopped a shooting at an abortion clinic come to mind among many others.

    The other studies are BS too. They all fail to control for criminals or illicit drug use. From 65-90% of the shooters and their victims are crooks depending on what years and what cities you look at, not gun owners like you. You would be a crook if hunting was the crime it should be.

    You didn't even report the BS accurately. The CDC has reported that people use guns to scare off intruders about 498,000 times a year, well over the 100,000 shot for any reason, including hunting accidents.

    Any way you slice it, owning a gun for self defense makes more sense than owning it for killing animals you don't have to. You don't really need a gun for self defense either. In most cases guns "used" in defense are never fired, and when they are it's just 2 shots at less than 15 ft. That's chem spray and Taser territory.

    Bottom line, nobody but the cops and military needs a gun, and hunters need them less than most gun owners.


    Last edited [12/28/12 12:20 PM]
  • First the nuts,  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 1:46 PM ]

    then the hunters. The last mass murder in Britain was done w a hunting rifle. If all 14 million hunters joined the National Hunting Association, we could finish w "Fuck the NHA!

  • Fuck the memory manufacturers too!  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 2:18 PM ]

    640k should be enough for anyone. Nobody needs a megabyte.

  • Fuck the AHA too!  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 3:18 PM ]

    American Homebrewers Association. Beer kills too doncha know?

  • Hold it right there, dude  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 4:16 PM ]

    We could argue all day (actually: please no) about founders' intent regarding militias, or armed citizenry having a check against the government's armed forces but this is a new one. Are you really expecting to attack "Brewer, Patriot" while I just sit back and watch?

    The only thing beer kills are pathogens!

  • Prohibit DATF  [ Fri Dec 28 2012 9:36 PM ]

    Drugs, alcohol tobacco, and firearms; the true four horseman. Alcohol kills more kids (4500) every year than assault weapons. Just because Prohibition and the Assault Weapon ban didn't work so well the first time doesn't mean we shouldn't try again. If it saves just one life it's worth it! Do it for the kids!

    Then we move on to junk food and drinks... and finish up w an exercise mandate. Kinda. We can't make you sweat, but we can tax you if you don't.

  • Hunting with Cop Killers  [ Sat Dec 29 2012 6:03 AM ]

    So why do hunters need rifles, ammo, and scopes that can blast through a cop's vest and blow him out of his boots at 500 yds, then allow a quick follow up coup de grace if they miss or wound?

    Time to reduce the power of hunting weapons. You don't need scopes, bolts, pumps, or levers. It's only a matter of time before somebody climbs into a tower and starts picking off innocent civilians on the street below... oh wait, they already did that!

    Single shot smoothbores, no scopes. You are "sportsmen", not snipers.


    Last edited [12/29/12 6:06 AM]
  • Compensation blues  [ Sat Dec 29 2012 10:18 PM ]

    levaux

    You whine because you have to hunt in less than ideal weather, that it's loud an inch from your ear and you don't do it for jollies. Don't kill then, dumb-ass. Is it only a walk in the woods if you don't splatter a creatures blood and guts all over the trees?

    Do you actually think you garner respect when you brag for being a hunter??? Most people consider killers like you to be sub-human, and you need a powerful weapon to compensate for inadequacies between your legs.

    No regards, cretin

    Mike

  • Divide and conquer  [ Sun Dec 30 2012 3:23 PM ]

    I like getting the hunters to fuck the NRA now; that will make it a lot easier to fuck the hunters later.

    The niftiest thing about it is, even though hunters know that, enough of them will do it anyway.


    Last edited [12/30/12 3:26 PM]
  • Hypocrite Hunter's Half-witted harangue  [ Tue Jan 1 2013 7:18 PM ]

    Who has repeatedly protected your hunting ammunition form adverse legislation and BATFE rulemaking?

    The NRA.

    Who sends reps to protect your rights to hunt to every state game commission in the nation?

    The NRA.

    Who works ceaselessly to maintain YOUR access to hunt on public lands?

    The NRA.

    Who assists in keeping the makers of your hunting firearms free from onerous legislation and spurious liability claims?

    The NRA

    Who fights to ensure your right to hunt with handguns, Black-powder rifles, and bow and arrow?

    The NRA

    Who battles environmental and animal rights extremists so that you may enjoy your pastime, and perhaps method of feeding your family?

    The Mother Jones study is tragically and intentionally flawed. The way they count a mass shooting, it never occurred unless at least four people died. So a lawful gun owner, who stops a mass shooting, isn’t credited unless he waits until four have died:

    [link]

    Further, I never knew Mother Jones was such a pro-hunting publication.

    But I can say sir, that you are an ingrate.A hypocrite. And a damn fool. For all the NRA has done for YOU and hunters everywhere, you have chosen to smear and belittle them as a thank you gift.

    Further, you show a sense of moral bigotry I.E, 'my gun and sport good, yours bad’. It represents you as an elitist snob, to be disregarded.

    Shall it be so.


    Last edited [1/1/13 8:13 PM]
  • Collateral benefit  [ Wed Jan 2 2013 9:45 AM ]

    Yep, the NRA saves cop killer guns and ammo by claiming hunters need them to kill animals they don't have to.

    BTW, hunters kill more people (100) by mistake every year than self defense shooters do too (30).

    The more time the NRA and some hunters spend sniping at each other, the safer everybody, and everything, else is.

    Heck, we can probably save enough in replacing road signs to save Social Security.


    Last edited [1/2/13 9:51 AM]
  • Ari shoots off his mouth...  [ Wed Jan 2 2013 3:12 PM ]

    ... and hits his foot; hunters do that a lot.

    Every year hunters kill more people accidently than psychos w assault weapons do on purpose.

    Nobody has to hunt; that's what food stamps are for. People do need to defend themselves; they don't need firearms to do it.

    Sportsmen should be limited to Bronze Age technology. Defenders to modern less lethal technology. Patriots can join the militia or National guard before the next revolution or civil war.

    Modern firearms pose much more of a risk to public safety than they do benefit in securing a free state or defending a home.

    I suspect the SCOTUS will eventually recognize that too; a mind on the court will change, or the court will change. The sooner the better.

 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    "The Best is Yet to Come"
    "The Best is Yet to Come"6.21.2013