alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
Environment

Something Very Confusing

Mass Development, Jerk Face Littering and Life as Pollution

Why is this allowed?
Why is this allowed?

We* had a car when we moved to Albuquerque this summer, but its undercarriage fell out -- which is a ridiculously expensive problem to fix -- and so we decided** we could handle being without one. We're fortunate to live in a great spot for riding mass transit, in a little house that's plopped perfectly, equidistantly between Central and Lomas. Turns out, we sleep pretty well at night knowing that we're sharing our commutes' carbon footprints with other transit riders instead of making our own.

It's not often that either of us feels particularly deprived by not having our own vehicle. Except -- ironically, I suppose -- when we want to go into nature, which is pretty hard to do on the bus/rail lines. This weekend, after a particularly tricky and trying last week, we felt like getting out of town and walking off some steam. So we rented a car.

Don't let the pristine appearance fool you. There are beer bottles smashed up and down the whole of the mountain.
Don't let the pristine appearance fool you. There are beer bottles smashed up and down the whole of the mountain.

On Saturday, not wanting to risk getting trapped in our non-weatherized rental car on snow-covered mountain roads, we walked 7-ish-miles-round-trip along the Bosque. On Sunday, we hiked a surprisingly strenuous 5-ish-miles-round-trip-up-and-back to the McCauley Hot Springs outside of Jemez. It was all so beautiful. New Mexico's landscapes are stunningly diverse. Awe inspiringly so, in fact.

But I'd be lying if I said I didn't feel some anger as we explored these environments. The side of the Bosque we wandered was open and wild (save the occasional monitoring station surrounded by chain-link). Yet across the water, houses sprawl endlessly; big ugly developments and monstrous McMansions subsume the riverbanks. At the hot springs, some jerk face(s) had left beer bottles and soda cans and odd articles of clothing littered across the mountainside.

I know that the litter may seem less offensive than the mass development, but when it's all boiled down, it's all part of the same problem. Leaving trash behind is an indication, a symptom maybe, of the attitude that allows houses to smash entire ecosystems out of existence, that allows ease and earnings to trump conscientiousness.

This has all been on my mind pretty constantly lately, as over the last however many weeks, I've watched/encountered an unusually high number of environmentally-centered films, plays, exhibits and installations. And the more I think about it all, the more I engage with the problem, the more perplexed I am. I just don't know how we can do what we need to do to protect/save the planet when we can't even get people to pick up their own fucking garbage. Let alone change their entire day-to-day routines.

Especially because people (people like me and maybe you) who do pick up after themselves, who do think about how their actions affect the environment, who do make efforts to reduce their impact, do damage daily anyway. It's like it's inbred in us... Work. Pollute. Relax. Pollute. Eat. Pollute. Drive. Pollute. Live. Pollute... Pollute. Kill.

The growing local movement seems like the best possible solution to the problem. So that's how we've been trying to operate. It's admittedly difficult at times. And we end up doing things like renting cars. But we're trying. And hopefully we'll continue to improve.

And I'm no less confused now than I was at the beginning of this blog. But at least I've gotten all of this out of my head. However incoherently.

Thanks, guys. You're saving me a fortune in therapy bills.

*We = me + Alex, my fiance
** By "decided," I mean that we made a choice to eat instead of buy a new car.

Public Comments (23)
  • It is way messed up.  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:16 PM ]

    All you can do is try to pick it up yourself.


    Last edited [3/24/10 12:17 PM]
  • So what you're saying is  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:18 PM ]

    that it's noble and virtuous that you're decreasing your carbon footprint as a consequence, and not a choice?

    You start off by saying you no longer have a car because you can't afford to fix it, and then get all pro-environment because you no longer drive said car. I'm confused.

  • Nooo  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:28 PM ]

    what she's saying is that she opted not to fix it and found she was fine without it. Also, she saying tha 505 trashes its open spaces.

    Are you pro-trash, Fox? Pro carbon footprint? An old, old man?

  • Oh, Fox.  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:29 PM ]

    I (this is Julia) don't usually respond to feedback on things I've written, but... I knew someone would say just what you said, so:

    My point wasn't to claim nobility or virtue. Just to share/explore my thoughts on, my confusions about and my own hypocrisies in relation to the subject. The point was largely made at the end: I don't know how to fix things when damaging them is so engrained in our day-to-day lives.

    Perhaps your confusion would be mitigated if you read the entry again, with a different frame of mind?

  • It's difficult to reconcile  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:45 PM ]

    The current system, the way it's set up, makes it nearly impossible to live in a manner that is 100% congruous for environmental health and preservation.

    My career is focused on environmental restoration, water health, and agricultural health in NM. I traveled to Dubai (among other cities in the Middle East) in Dec., and the experience left me feeling like all of our efforts for sustainability, promotion of local economy and agriculture, and energy conservation is more than fifty times canceled out by the unabashed development and energy use in that area of the world.

    You hit the nail on the head with "confusing." I didn't know which way was up when I returned to NM.

  • Kiddies, Relax  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 12:55 PM ]

    davisi, I'm not proclaiming I'm pro-anything, just how I wouldn't proclaim I'm anti-anything as a result of me being too broke/lazy to fix the now-offending problem.

    I understand what you're saying Julia, but it just felt like the tone of you writing took a very strong, pro-environmental stance (which is fine), but you begin by saying your car is out of commission and you're too broke to fix it.

    Maybe your point (even with its intended hypocrisies) would ring a tad clearer if, as a result of seeing trash all around the open spaces around town, would inspire you to ditch your perfectly-running car when a choice is clearly at stake.


    Last edited [3/24/10 12:56 PM]
  • While we can all do better  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 1:00 PM ]

    it all begins with attitude. Too many people have an attitude of "I do what I want because I can," and that includes littering, driving monster trucks at high speeds while blaring metal music down residential roads, and attaching "truck balls" to said trucks.

    And I don't think I read J's decision to not get a new car as motivated solely by finances. Nearly every New Mexican has, at one time, gone into ridiculous debt to buy a car. Lack of money stops almost no one here, often for good reasons. More like it was a confluence of circumstances that's allowed her to see things in a different way, yah?

  • incoherent but by the author's admission  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 1:10 PM ]

    She did apologize at the end for the incoherent nature of the blog. It is a bit confusing in tone and theme to go from being too broke to fix your car to observing nature being trashed. The point from A to B is not really connected even though one might want to establish a theme. This is just the way good writing is done.

    It IS a blog though and she did point out that she was just emptying things out of her head.

  • Let Me Clarify  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 1:10 PM ]

    The trucks with attached balls thing is due to phallic deficiency. I sympathize with all of the extremely unhappy women in New Mexico who have never experienced an orgasm, and who never will as long as they're dating a short little insecure man with a super-loud lifted truck and fucking the flesh equivalent of a thimble.

    However, I'm not sure if this, or playing loud metal music, really leads to environmental apathy, though. That's kind of a sweeping generalization.

    And I wasn't talking about Julia's not wanting to buy a new car, just not being able to/wanting to fix the one she already had. I'm pretty sure every PERSON out there has or will accrue a massive amount of debt to buy a car, or a house, or to start a business. These things do happen, you know.


    Last edited [3/24/10 1:11 PM]
  • JDogg-  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 1:20 PM ]

    When can we see your blogs up? Or are they already properties of the Smithsonian?

  • I will aim for incoherence...​  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 2:25 PM ]

    ...in my blogs a little bit more often, because it's prompting pretty enthusiastic and surprisingly voluminous dialogue. And that's pretty great.

  • speaking of..  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 2:34 PM ]

    a sweeping generalization, Foxy McC:

    not all short men are 'little' nor insecure..in my dating experience, anyway. ;)

    (off topic? yes; but thought I'd give props to the short AND secure fellas out there!)

  • mjm  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 2:39 PM ]

    I'm sure you're right, but I was referring mostly to the short men that own the type of trucks that darcy was describing. A certain type of short man, if you will.

  • Fuck a car.  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 2:56 PM ]

    Good for you for not fixing yours and opting to use mass transit instead. It DOES decrease your carbon footprint. No matter how you get carless—being broke or being wise or both—it's smart. Big trucks do equal environmental apathy.

    This is decent writing. Why all the naysaying?

    Also, I know y'all are giving yourselves those five stars.

  • what's with cranky mccrankerpants​?  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:13 PM ]

    no one said it's not decent writing, davisi. and I'm not sure who gave me five stars but I sure as hell gave Foxy five stars on his response to me. and I will now proceed to give you one star for being grumpy. chill!

  • I'm not cranky.  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:26 PM ]

    I'm drunk.

  • Being Wise?  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:30 PM ]

    What if you view a car as more than a transportation device that spits out noxious fumes? I, for one, am extremely into the culture of cars and automotive performance, so I look at it as a type of hobby.

    I offer davisi 4 stars for the semi-relateable response :)

  • ahhh...  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:40 PM ]

    well played, davisi. well played. ;)

  • hah!  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:52 PM ]

    When can we see your blogs up? Or are they already properties of the Smithsonian?

    To steal a quote from mjm "well played". Good point DarcyBennett. Just making an observation man! But your point is taken.

  • on writing  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:55 PM ]

    Good for you for not fixing yours and opting to use mass transit instead. It DOES decrease your carbon footprint. No matter how you get carless—being broke or being wise or both—it's smart. Big trucks do equal environmental apathy.

    This is decent writing. Why all the naysaying?

    Also, I know y'all are giving yourselves those five stars.

    I just gave DarcyBennett four stars for making me laugh and making a good point, even at my expense. I can be objective but honestly, good writing is good writing sorry. I separate the topic from the articulation. I don't care about spelling errors either because I'm interested in the WRITING.

  • carbon footprint  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 3:57 PM ]

    For the record I take the bus everyday too, mostly because it's cheap and I can't get a parking space on UNM campus for under 300 dollars a year or something. But yeah, I guess I can pat myself on the back for reducing my carbon footprint as well but like the writer/blogger, it started as mostly a money issue.

  • Why do we use autos so much  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 4:26 PM ]

    when bikes and buses are cheaper and better for you?

    Now I'm Don Schrader. It's a fine line.

  • Because  [ Wed Mar 24 2010 4:39 PM ]

    Not all of us live within a walking/biking distance of our place of employment, unfortunately.

    Albuquerque's very, very, very spread out, so it becomes a necessity as opposed to cities where public transit is preferred and commonplace (Boston, NYC, etc.)

    And most people I know are scared shitless of taking the Rapid Ride, especially after dark.

Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    $50 Tattoo benefit
    $50 Tattoo benefit6.1.2013