alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
 V.18 No.42 | October 15 - 21, 2009 

Film Review

Where the Wild Things Are

Fearless fantasy captures the imagination as well as the emotion of being a child

Pokémon has changed a lot in the last decade.
Pokémon has changed a lot in the last decade.

Where the Wild Things Are

Directed by Spike Jonze

Cast: Max Records, Catherine Keener, James Gandolfini

Where the Wild Things Are is the first kid-oriented film to come out of Hollywood in a great while that doesn’t begin with a voice-over narration. That might not seem like a very big deal, but I assure you it is. Almost every film aimed anywhere under the 18-to-49 demographic begins with a voice-over explaining the entire upcoming situation to kids. Where the Wild Things Are doesn’t. It just starts.

Finally, a film that understands the difference between talking to kids and talking down to kids.

Maurice Sendak’s much-beloved, multi-award-winning children’s book couldn’t have been the easiest inspiration for a feature film. Look at the gap between book publication and movie release (1963/2009). Ponder the contentious history of the film itself. (Distributor Warner Brothers sat on the film for a year hemming and hawing over what to do with it and even considered reshooting the entire project.) Not only is it daunting tackling a time-honored classic plucked from just about everybody’s childhood bookshelf, but the 10 whole sentences that comprise Sendak’s picture book don’t provide all that much material for big screen adaptation.

Elementary school, for one, would be a better place with more monsters.
Elementary school, for one, would be a better place with more monsters.

Fortunately, the right names got attached to this one. The director is music-video-guru-turned-indie-sensation Spike Jonze, whose singular cinematic visions (Being John Malkovich, Adaptation.) have earned him some serious film industry cachet. To write the screenplay, Jonze teamed up with Pulitzer Prize-nominated author Dave Eggers (A Staggering Work of Heartbreaking Genius, You Shall Know Our Velocity!). Rather than inflate Mr. Sendak’s phantasmagorical picture book with unnecessary backstory and unconnected subplot, the duo have stuck as closely to the original, stream-of-consciousness narrative as possible.

As in the book, our protagonist is Max (intuitive newcomer Max Records). Max is an underaged hellraiser who dresses in a wolf costume and terrorizes his household. Expanding slightly on Sendak’s book, we find that Max’s mom (Catherine Keener) is a single woman. (By divorce or widowhood? The film doesn’t say.) She’s trying to date (Mark Ruffalo, in a brief cameo), but it isn’t easy with imaginative, emotional, utterly uncontrollable Max running around. Sent to bed without his supper after one particularly ill-timed tantrum, Max runs away from home. Sailing away on a tiny boat, Max ends up on an island inhabited by towering, hairy monsters. Childlike themselves, these monsters would rather smash things than think through the consequences. Angry little Max finds a powerful kinship with these raging creatures of the Id and is soon declared King of All Wild Things.

That the amazing monster costumes come courtesy of Jim Henson’s Creature Shop is no surprise. Jumping, leaping and tumbling across the landscape, they feel less like delicate “special effects” and more like giant, fuzzy actors. With a fair amount of CGI manipulation to enhance their facial expressions, these Big Bird-esque creatures come to magnificent life, each distinct in its own personality. (Take a glance at the book afterward—they’re exact reproductions of Sendak’s drawings.) It doesn’t hurt that a fine troupe of vocal talents are on hand to lend their voices as well (James Gandolfini, Paul Dano, Catherine O’Hara, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Lauren Ambrose).

The filmmakers stick doggedly to Sendak’s tone—both visually and psychologically. Using mostly handheld cameras, the stark backdrop of coastal Australia and some incredible, Andy Goldsworthy-inspired set pieces, the film generates an inescapable otherworldly quality. Even as the opening credits roll (defaced in crayon-like scrawl marks courtesy of Max), you’ll realize this isn’t the sort of candy-coated fairy tale that’s so often peddled to kids these days. Thematically, Sendak was exploring the issue of childhood anger, and he didn’t moralize against it. He simply treated it as a phase that all children go through while trying to understanding their emotions—the bad ones as well as the good. Jonze’s film doesn’t begin with a simpleminded narration, and it doesn’t end with a clear-cut moral, either. Almost any other filmmaker would have tied this up in a nice little bow with a message about how families stick together and love each other unconditionally. But Where the Wild Things Are doesn’t say that. Instead, it honestly admits that families are messy, emotional, confusing entities that require constant work and are rarely anything close to perfect.

Whether Where the Wild Things Are is ultimately embraced by young children or thirtysomething hipsters who just want to get in touch with their inner prepubescent remains to be seen. It’s dark and melancholy and occasionally a tad violent (although, given the tone, “a tad rough and tumble” might be a better phrase). Since the high point of the film is a full-fledged dirt-clod fight (something I’ve always viewed as a sacred institution of childhood), I’m willing to believe the filmmakers are on the right course and have arrived at a true classic of the family film genre. It may take a while for this film to get its due (The Wizard of Oz was a bomb when it came out), but it’s a bold, brilliant, admirably artistic take on a world we all visited at one time or another in our childhood dreams. Thanks for the return trip, folks.


Where the Wild Things Are

Filmmaker Spike Jonze (Being John Malkovich) and writer Dave Eggers (A Staggering Work of Heartbreaking Genius) expand on the emotional, imaginative tone of Maurice Sendak's much-beloved kiddie classic without inflating the phantasmagorical picture book with unnecessary backstory and unconnected subplot. 102 minutes PG.

Public Comments (11)
  • I say flee it.  [ Sat Oct 17 2009 8:38 PM ]

    It's a downer. In fact, it's a somewhat pretentious super downer, and I feel I should warn movie fans with a second opinion.

    Some key scenes and aspects of the book are entirely changed to no advantage. Devin writes, "Rather than inflate Mr. Sendak’s phantasmagorical picture book with unnecessary backstory and unconnected subplot, the duo have stuck as closely to the original, stream-of-consciousness narrative as possible." I disagree. It's true there's no subplot involving, say, a monkey who stole a magic key that can return Max home... But there's a very great deal of added emotional subplot that didn't ring true for me, and strayed very, very far from the original material.

    The camera work was jerky (in a Blair Witch kind of way) and gave me a headache.

    Arcade Fire's soundtrack was a bit too quirky/cutesy and definitely mixed too loud. It was distracting and mildly embarrassing. I suspect it will date the movie rather than help make it a classic.

    Had the costumes been less than amazing I might have actually walked out. As it was, I practically ran out of the theater when it was over and kissed the sidewalk in thanks for my freedom.

  • Weird choice to make this film in the first place  [ Sun Oct 18 2009 1:13 PM ]

    Apparently Maurice Sendak was involved in the whole process and gave it his thumbs-up, but if George Lucas has taught us anything, it's that the creator-in-the-present can't always be trusted to be a wise custodian of the works of the creator-in-the-past.

    So now we have a WTWTA film that I can't take my 5-year-old kid to see. Huh?

  • Arcade Fire didn't do the soundtrack  [ Sun Oct 18 2009 5:25 PM ]

    It was Karen O (from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs).

    We saw it today. I liked parts of it a lot, but overall it filled you with a sort of bone-sadness. My husband says that's Spike Jonze being Spike Jonze, with the message "Life is kind of rotten."

    The thing is, this movie is not intended in any way for, nor was it marketed to, young kids. Older kids maybe, but really it's a movie for 30-45 year olds who love nostalgia porn. I'm all for that, but the whimsy that seemed to be communicated in the trailers (which was where Arcade Fire was used) was largely absent from the movie. I liked it, but I wanted to love it.

  • The overbearingly "indie" music  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:01 AM ]

    became a bit much.

    While far from being a horrible movie, I felt it kind of wandered and never really hit a point home and just kind of moped along for an hour and a half.

    While what I just said could be debated with most other movies (perhaps it's the intent of the director), it's very difficult to make a case for that when the book it is based off of is ten sentences long.

    While much better than Cat in the Hat, if we've learned anything at all it's that turning a short, concise children's book into a nostalgic full-length feature film is really difficult to do successfully.

  • Hipsters.  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:04 AM ]

    The Wild Things were hipsters. I'll stop short of speculating what that says about the film's target audience.

  • Eggers  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:12 AM ]

    didn't add any heartbreaking humor to it? Too bad.

  • Mindblowing philosophical pronouncement  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:23 AM ]

    I haven't seen the film yet, but Dave Eggers Eggers and WTWTA both seem concerned with solipsism. Pow!

  • Catherine Keener  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:30 AM ]

    I could listen to her voice for hours. Love that woman.

  • other voices  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 11:36 AM ]

    I love- Angelica Houston (I love everything about her) and Patricia Clarkson.

  • You all are just haters, I'm with D. O'L.  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 12:58 PM ]

    The movie was pretty fucking great, and O'Leary's review is both succinct and thorough. I really don't know what everyone was expecting to complain like this. As for the added emotional sub-plot, how else you're going to fill a feature length film based on a 48 page children's book. The way it was expanded was great, IMO. Would you rather have had a monkey hiding the magic key? I thought it maintained the tone of the book nicely. I'm sure Sendak having had a hand in it helped. It's not like George Lucas didn't make phenomenal movies. He didn't fuck them up until he tried to redo or needlessly expand on them.

    Maybe I'm just relieved that the film could have gone so terribly wrong and didn't.

  • WTWTA marketing  [ Mon Oct 19 2009 3:12 PM ]

    The thing is, this movie is not intended in any way for, nor was it marketed to, young kids.

    I saw a trailer for it right up there with Astro Boy, Hannah Montana and Toy Story 3-D when I took my kids to see Ponyo. So, yeah, it's being marketed to kids. Or was last month anyhow.

 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    LIVE REGGAE @ BURT'S TIKI
    LIVE REGGAE @ BURT'S TIKI5.25.2013