alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
 V.17 No.12 | March 20 - 26, 2008 

Thin Line

Out of Sight, Out of Mind

It was a simple idea: Let's put faces to the names of soldiers New Mexico sacrificed to the war effort. The cover of the Alibi this week is, in plainest terms, a reminder of what these last five years have cost.

I've worked at newspapers since just after 9/11. I remember when we went to war and all the headlines that followed. I've copyedited AP story after AP story about suicide bombers, handmade roadside bombs, gunfire and casualties—American or otherwise. I wrote a headline the day the U.S. death toll hit 2,000. Then two more soldiers died. Then another. Today, the official count is around 4,000, though that number differs depending on who you ask.

All along the way, I wondered: Are people reading these stories? They’ve been shuffled from A1 to A6 to A10. And, similarly, reader interest is dropping, too. According to a survey by the Pew Research Center, only 16 percent of Americans, when asked what's in the news, name the Iraq War. The amount of space devoted to Iraq by news outlets dropped radically last year, too. In January, 26 percent of the newshole was going to Iraq, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism. In June and August, that number dropped to 11 percent.

Didn't the national media learn their lesson the first time they stopped asking smart questions and telling the stories of the Iraq War? You remember, right? Back when we first went to war?

Maybe people just aren't interested. Headline after headline about casualties and policy cause a nearly subconscious public blind spot. "More Dead in Iraq" in 24-point bold might as well declare "Something Something" to the numbed audience.

Or maybe, once again, the national media is falling down on its job of finding and presenting compelling stories.

A death toll is one thing to marvel at. The tale of one soldier and the difficulty of adjusting back to the civilian world, of a young married couple who have only been in one another's presence for one-fifth of their married life—putting a face to the name to the number—it's not these stories the public's blipped out. Human tales still need telling.

As the elections vacuum more time and space in our nation's media, as you watch the politicos talk about Iraq plans and strategy and what they would do if they were in office, keep in mind that there are faces in that death toll. Ask your media when they're going to show them to you.

It's crucial we remember the war on its five-year anniversary. The more urgent and onerous task is remembering it every day after.

Public Comments (1)
  • Nice to see someone in the "big bad media" asking this question  [ Thu Mar 20 2008 12:37 PM ]

    I like Marisa's article, precisely because it points out the fatal flaw in our "drive through" media these days. We as a culture, for better or worse, aren't interested in yesterday's news. As a matter of fact, when today's news resembles yesterday's news, we're not interested in it either. Unfortunately, the daily news release of the body count in the GWOT isn't getting the same traction that it used to.

    I remember my first trip to Iraq, back in the spring of 2001. While enforcing the no-fly zone that covers the Kurdish north of the country, we would get shot at every day. Upon my return to the USA, I found it disheartening (yet not surprising) that nearly everyone I talked to had no idea that U.S. airmen were getting shot at by Saddam's forces in the skies over Iraq. It simply wasn't newsworthy. My family scoured the news while I was gone, hoping to keep up on what I was doing over there. Their efforts were largely unsuccessful.

    I guess what I'm saying is that our becoming numb to Iraqi news isn't a recent phenomenon, nor is it associated with just the past five years. Since 1991, non-sensational news from Iraq has been relegated to the dark alleyways of the media......the difference these days is that there are now deceased soldiers' names in the news articles.

    Who's fault is this? Well, that's a hard one to pin down. What gets reported in the media is the result of the cyclical process of supply and demand. The media finds a story and reports it, the public gives feedback by way of ratings and sales. These days, I'd expect that your average citizen would know more about Britney and K-Fed than what's happening in Baquba, Sadr City, or Mosul.....Shame on us all for that.

 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    Heavier than Frack
    Heavier than Frack5.29.2013