alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
 V.17 No.19 | May 8 - 14, 2008 

News Feature

Pull No Punches

Native Americans respond to the Alibi's interview with Charles Langley

After publication of last week's feature, " Good Medicine," the e-mails started rolling in, then comments on the story online, then phone calls. Some Native Americans who read the story were angered by its contents, by its presentation and because they said it furthered stereotypes.

"There are so many problems with this article and the man it features that I could probably write a dissertation about them (not to mention the images)," wrote tslee at Alibi.com. "There are thousands of Navajos that live in Albuquerque, and you choose a white guy from England to tell Albuquerque, including those Navajo residents, about Navajo medicine men."

The article written by Editor Christie Chisholm was published as a Q&A about Charles Langley, who's authored a yet-to-be-released book called Meeting the Medicine Men: An Englishman's Travels Among the Navajo. The book recounts Langley's time on the Navajo reservation, he says, and will be published in the travel literature genre. Chisholm addresses comments directed toward her involvement in the editorial accompanying this article.

Mary K. Bowannie is a lecturer in the Native American Studies department at UNM, and among her other classes, she also teaches a course on newspaper publication. Every spring her students, with production and editorial mentorship by the Navajo Times, put out a 16-page newspaper. "It wasn't very balanced and objective," Bowannie said of the feature. "It really took primarily his words and experiences into account, but I didn't feel that there was the other side to the story." She says the obvious unanswered critical question is: Why does this man feel the need to "play Indian”?

Some say they just didn't like the way the Alibi put the story together. "There's no conversation with the people that are here, that live here," says Patrick Willink, an adjunct lecturer at the Native American Studies department. "All of the Native American people are presented as scenery or characters without any real engagement."

Langley should have kept his information about medicine men to himself and “shouldn't be broadcasting like that," says Roseann Willink, an instructor of Navajo language at UNM. "Somebody opened a can of worms."

Many of the people interviewed for this follow-up story took issue with the images that ran with the feature. The front page was one problem for JJ Otero, organizer of the Native concert Rock the 9 that took place on April 25. "What struck me first was the cover shot," Otero says, alluding to the image of a Native American man wearing traditional dress at the Gathering of Nations. "It's trying to represent modern culture as if it's still in that state." Others raised concerns about a lack of specificity in the captions for the photos accompanying the feature, and a lack of captions period.

Langley Responds

Otero also posted on Alibi.com that Langley should have researched his own history to "find a mystical place in this world."

"Unfortunately," says Langley in an interview about the criticism, "such things in English history have been wiped out by industrialization. I didn't choose to come here and learn about Navajo medicine. It just kind of happened. It was an extraordinary series of events which brought me here."

Langley says he's never pretended to be a medicine man, nor does he have any intention of becoming one. "What I actually am is the bag carrier and driver," he says. "I'm an assistant, and my role, basically, is to help medicine men by driving them around up to 12 hours a day." Langley came to New Mexico in 2003 and says he continues to be involved with medicine men. The character he calls Blue Horse, the medicine man he says he followed, "is an amalgam of more than one person." Langley wouldn't give contact information for any of the medicine men he's worked with because, he says, he's concerned about protecting their privacy. "I say at the beginning of the book that everything I've recounted, I've changed the places, the names, so nobody could be recognized."

Patrick Willink, who says the article was along the same narrow lines as a Tony Hillerman novel, wondered whether the Native people in the book knew of its publishing and whether they would receive any of the money it generates.

Langley says he would have never contemplated writing this book if he hadn't heard from so many people on the reservations complaining about detective books that misrepresent them. He says he did have permission from the medicine men to write about them and that they all received manuscripts as it was being written. "Whether anybody actually read it or not, I don't know." He will gladly share some of the cash, should the book make any, with his Native American friends, he says.

One commenter called Langley a voyeur. "I don't think so," says Langley. If you consider the book as a straight piece of reporting, he says, maybe it could be seen as voyeurism. “But then anybody that writes about anything involving real people could be accused of voyeurism."

100 Times Over

Some questioned the facts of Langley’s tale and whether some of the more private information about the medicine men’s practices should have been revealed. "There's nothing in my book that hasn't been said 100 times over. It's just that I'm saying it in a slightly different way," Langley says. People couldn't read the book and learn how to put together a medicine ceremony, he adds. Further, as only a freshman in UNM's Anthropology Department, Langley says the book, which was written before he ever started attending the university, is certainly not a body of research.

Patrick Willink suspects the book would not have gotten through the Institutional Review Board at UNM, which monitors the research of human subjects, or through the Navajo Nation's review board. "A way to bypass the review board is to fictionalize parts of the story or pass it off as travel writing," Willink says. Langley says the book did not go through UNM’s review board, nor was it approved by the Navajo Nation. The book is about his experience, and it wasn’t a study, he says. He didn’t feel there was a reason to get such approvals, he finishes.

Scramcat on Alibi.com asks why, if Langley is so close to the medicine men, he hasn't been invited to live on the Navajo reservation, since Langley expresses regret that he does not in the original article. Langley says he's in Albuquerque because he's attending UNM, but there's no shortage of people that would be happy to see him on the rez. "Medicine men don't announce that they're medicine men," adds scramcat. Langley counters by saying medicine men are well-known and well-regarded in the communities they're working in. "I only got to do this because I was invited to," says Langley.

Bowannie called the feature another unfortunate episode in the history of Native Americans being misinterpreted and stereotyped. "To be able to put out a story—it's precious space, and it always seems that these types of stories are more attractive and more interesting than talking about the realities of Native people in this country, or globally."

Public Comments (4)
  • Still disgusted  [ Thu May 8 2008 9:51 AM ]

    After reading his responses and listening to his interview and comments on Native American Calling, I still have the same opinion that I had of Langley when I first read “Good Medicine” in the Alibi. Langley’s responses in the Opinion section of the Alibi and in Native American Calling reinforce his lack of cultural sensitivity. I can’t help but feel that he is just a failed writer trying to make a quick buck.

    I’m still convinced he got most of his material from the likes of Tony Hillerman novels. A few listeners pointed out to him yesterday that the ceremonies he described in his book are those of the Native American Church, not traditional Navajo ceremonies. Even the cover of his book shows a picture of a tipi. Since when do traditional Navajos live in tipis? Langley claims that he participated in a variety of healing ceremonies, Navajo and NAC, but where does he make this distinction clear? Does that mean that to him, there’s no difference between a traditional Navajo ceremony or any other Native healing ceremonies? Also, the comment by wazure in the "Good Medicine" article makes a good point in asking “how is it that Langley understands what is going on? How can he train to be a medicine man if he doesn't speak the language?”

    Langley also claims that “It just happened” when asked about his reason for following around Navajo medicine men. Oh, please. It’s not like anyone tied him up, strapped him to the seat of their pickup trucks, and forced him to tag along. If he really was allowed to tag-along, he had a choice to do so.

    Finally, Langley claims that he’s not trying to be a medicine man and at most, he was just the driver and bell boy for the real medicine men. If he isn’t trying to be a medicine man, then what the heck is up with those pictures in the article of him dressed in Native gear, particularly the photo with the subscript “Razzle Dazzle” taken at the Gathering of Nations powwow. If he’s not trying to be Native there, then what is he doing, showing his support as a fan for the Washington Redskins?

    I know lots of non-Natives have healing powers as Langley claims he does, but this guy needs to find a place of his own even though he says the European history of has been “wiped out by industrialization.” Langley says he was prompted to write the book through encouragement by the medicine men who feel that they have been improperly portrayed in the past. Well, sorry to say, Langley’s book doesn’t help one bit and the medicine men and Navajo people are still stereotyped. He says he picked and chose his experiences to write about because he wrote it for “his own people” to become aware of Navajo culture. Well Mr. Langley, picking and choosing only the “mystical” and “superstitious” aspects of Navajo people, particularly the stories and ideas of witchcraft in the fashion of a fiction novel is not the way we as Navajo people want our culture to be portrayed or learned about. I’d encourage you to take some Native American Studies classes while you’re at UNM. If you really want to help others learn about Native peoples, then start by learning yourself. Learn how to take a more appropriate approach of interacting with, gaining knowledge of, and writing about Native peoples. On the off-chance that everything he said happened is true, then he needs to learn how to treat his knowledge with the respect it deserves and when he shares it, to present it in a way that does not harm the cultures he is talking about.

  • This is the United States of America-- get over it!  [ Thu May 8 2008 8:35 PM ]

    I get very tired of the "political correctness nazis" arguing that this or that shouldn't be printed, invoking a requirement for "sensitivity" to whoever's being written about. One of the fundamental liberties of this nation is freedom of the press. Journalists can pretty much write about and publish whatever they please and, as long as its true, and often even when it's not, with very few exceptions (e.g., revealing nuclear weapon release codes would probably draw considerable governmental sanction), complaints of the "how dare he write (or you publish) such a thing!" sort are just whining. If Langley got the facts wrong, forums like this-- as well as the freedom to publish your own stuff-- give plenty of opportunity to set things right. Otherwise, Langley is NOT required to treat his knowledge "with respect" and he is NOT required to present it in a way that doesn't "harm the cultures he is talking about."

    In the article, I was particularly taken aback by the ignorant comments of lecturer Patrick Willink, who somehow got the idea that university standards were, by some stretch of the imagination, relevant to writing a popular book. Newsflash-- they're not. He also questioned "whether the Native people in the book knew of its publishing and whether they would receive any of the money it generates." Other than sheer altruistic generosity on Langley's part, why should they? When someone writes a travel book criticizing, for example, air travel, there's no expectation that the author will have to check back with all the passengers and crew on all the flights he or she observed and may have complained about, much less pay them for the privilege of writing about them.

    The facts are: Langley wrote a book. It described HIS observations of the culture & practices. He didn't commit espionage and reveal any truly secret information. If you don't like what he revealed, don't give stuff away to people you don't know and trust. If you disagree with what he wrote, write and publish your own book. Or voice your opinion here. Freedom of the Press... it's one of the things this country is all about. Anyone who doesn't like it should consider one of those Arab countries where insulting the wrong group allows mullas to bring legal sanction... or even get your head cut off. Thanks... but I prefer the lively controversy-- and even rude mudslinging-- the First Amendment allows.

  • sounds like fiction to me.  [ Thu May 8 2008 9:48 PM ]

    Above it states that "The character he calls Blue Horse, the medicine man he says he followed, 'is an amalgam of more than one person.' Langley wouldn't give contact information for any of the medicine men he's worked with because, he says, he's concerned about protecting their privacy. 'I say at the beginning of the book that everything I've recounted, I've changed the places, the names, so nobody could be recognized.'" Furthermore, it is stated above that the book "will be published in the travel literature genre."

    It sounds like this book belongs more in the fiction section than the travel literature section, especially is it is "along the same narrow lines as a Tony Hillerman novel." He's changed places and names...so how is this useful to anyone who's traveling or supposed to give anyone a sense of what it is really like to encounter a Navajo medicine man?

    Again I say that this book should be classified as straight up fiction. Maybe then it would offend less people. Hell, a southerner from Kentucky could have done a better job writing a book about being a lobster-fisherman from Maine.

  • The whole piece was laughable  [ Fri May 9 2008 3:36 PM ]

    Amen smellymel. I was surprized to read about the hostile reaction to this interview. It hardly seemed worth taking seriously at all. To me, it's pretty obvious this Langley guy is telling tall tales to sell books. I had to laugh at his story about a "skinwalker" who banged on his door all night. Why would banging on a door require the transformation into a creature? And how would this enable someone to knock on a door through a locked screen door?

    I sympathize with Indians who feel their culture is misrepresented and misunderstood in society at large, but I agree with lordclane that complaining about this interview is just a misdirected excuse to whine. I actually would like to learn more about Navajo culture, but I hope belief in witchcraft isn't widespread among Navajo peoples. While I might find it interesting, I cannot truly respect any belief involving witches, curses or the transformation of people into animals. On the other hand, I can respect the worship of the Earth and Nature along with a way of life that promotes a healthy, sybiotic relationship with the environment.

 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    Low Life Happy Hour!
    Low Life Happy Hour!5.24.2013