alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
                                                                                                   
 
 V.17 No.50 | December 11 - 17, 2008 

Pop Culture

Be a God

Local board game invokes the sacred to be profaned

An army of Buddhas, part of the Playing Gods Limited Edition, waits to be sent off to gamers across the country. The figurines are made in Albuquerque at Firewheel Casting.
Courtesey of Ben Radford
An army of Buddhas, part of the Playing Gods Limited Edition, waits to be sent off to gamers across the country. The figurines are made in Albuquerque at Firewheel Casting.

There could be hate mail. There could be death threats.

Ben Radford knew that going in. What else could he expect after joshing the world's most popular religions?

Radford's board game Playing Gods, released this month, asks players to use icons representing major religions to gain followers at all costs. Deities usually depicted in a peaceful, respectful manner are warlike figurines wearing artillery belts or firing automatic weapons. Only a couple weeks after its release, and the Alibi received a letter decrying an ad for the game that pictures a big-bellied Buddha dressed as Santa gleefully firing a machine gun.

And the controversy's just warming up for Radford, a Corrales-dweller, Alibi columnist and managing editor of Skeptical Inquirer magazine. The game's been featured in USA Today, on the Playboy blog and in Harper's Magazine.

 
 

The concept solidified for Radford as religion-based violence took center stage during the last decade. Many of the most large-scale conflicts in the world today are rooted in religion, Radford says. "Not all of it, certainly, but a lot of it has basis in different people believing they're God's chosen people." He feels disgust, he says, when considering all of the people who die as a result of these rigid beliefs. So he opted for satire as a way to say, "Hold on, here. Why do you care that someone else doesn't believe what you believe?"

It's not an unthought-of concept: What if all of humanity's gods were real and battling one another for followers? Radford says he has read the Bible, the Koran and the Torah. As a youngster, he fed an active gaming and fantasy life with Dungeons & Dragons. Though Radford also offers his degree in psychology and interest in history as credentials, a religious studies professor in the USA Today story about Playing Gods says the game has no basis in historical reality. Instead, says Professor Carl Raschke, the game appeals to hip atheists, people who hate religion.

Your landslide buries a shantytown; survivors thank you for saving them. Gain one sect.

A card in Playing Gods

But the focus of Playing Gods is not only satirizing religion; the game also spoofs the most vehement followers. As an example, Radford points to one card that instructs, "Your landslide buries a shantytown; survivors thank you for saving them. Gain one sect."

The game comes with "conversion" and "wrath" cards dictating play, and none of them are aimed at a specific religion. Cards that deal with distinct religions are part of an optional expansion pack. "I wanted to design the game so it has as much or as little religion as the player would want," says Radford, who identifies his own beliefs as agnostic.

Figurines include (in violent stances) Moses, Kali, Jesus, Buddha and a vaguely Muslim character that Radford is quick to point out is neither Allah nor Muhammad, as images of either are often prohibited in Islam. "People have gotten threats, and there have been riots over depictions of Muslim figures," Radford says. Still, it wouldn't have been fair to leave out Islam altogether, given that it's one of the major religions of the world. Playing Gods, he says, is an "equal-opportunity offender."

The game offers a blank deity piece players can put a sticker on. Among the available stickers: Oprah, Zeus, The Almighty Dollar, Tom Cruise (Scientology) or Technology. The sticker options extend the game's ability to make fun of anything encased in dogma. The game is playable, Radford says, using household items—a G.I. Joe action figure, a cat toy, a can of beer.

Development of the game was quite an ordeal, and it's been gestating for a couple of years. Evenings were spent in local restaurants eating sandwiches and test-playing the game with friends and family and taking notes. The real trick was to make a game complex enough that gamers would enjoy it, but that didn't require a phone book-sized instruction manual. Radford himself loses most rounds, he says. He self-released 5,000 copies of the game under a company he formed called Balls Out Entertainment.

The target audience is comprised of people who want something edgier in their entertainment, he says. "I grew up with Pac-Man. Now people are playing Grand Theft Auto IV. As the culture's tastes develop, people start expecting different things."

Radford says devout Christians have approached him with favorable reviews of Playing Gods. "It's not anti-religion," he insists. "It's anti-zealots, anti-people who kill for their beliefs." He's a little worried about unfavorable reactions but says he hopes people who would be offended by it would realize threats just prove his point. "I mean, come on, if your faith is so fragile that some criticism or some satire is going to harm it, then you've got bigger problems than my board game."

Public Comments (2)
  • Ben Radford defends not going out of his way to insult Islam  [ Fri Dec 12 2008 3:46 PM ]

    Sorry you're disappointed in me; I try to be, as the Slade song says, "all things to everyone," but in the end I can only do my best. A few things you should know:

    1) Islam is not the only religion whose figurehead is not named; in fact NONE of the gods are named in the rules, instructions, or cards. Yes, Muhammad is not named; neither is Buddha, Jesus, Kali, or Jesus. So I did not single out Islam for preferential treatment in the game. Players can call the gods anything they like, and if they want to refer to the Muslim figure as Muhammad, they certainly can.

    2) The game is meant to be entertaining, not incite violence. If you feel so strongly about portraying images of Muslim prophets, I encourage you to create your own project or game and do so. I will absolutely defend your right to do that. But it's easy to sit back and criticize.

    I'm quite familiar with criticisms of Islam, and I agree with a lot of it. But if I were to single out Islam for its beliefs in the game, I'd have to do the same for Christianity and the rest. Which I do, in the Expansion Pack, but was beyond the scope of the game.

  • doesn't go far enough  [ Mon Dec 29 2008 10:41 AM ]

    I got to play this game this weekend. Except for the figurines, the game doesn't really point fingers that could possibly offend anyone. Marisa's article and Ben's comment above give warning of that, but I just didn't realize how generic this game would be.

    I would have liked to have seen the game exploit stereotypes (preferably as offensively/insensitively as possible) to give the different religions different abilities. e.g. Muslims should have some special powers related to "terrorism," Scientologists and Christians have some sort of media bonus on conversions, etc. That would have not only made it funnier, but would have made the game more replayable. Instead, the religions are all the same; any strategy is going to come from the player himself. (Compare that to the computer game Alpha Centauri, where the choice of the faction you play has a fundamental influence on how things go, and you can have a totally different game just by changing who you play as.)

    Apparently the expansion pack addresses all this, but I think there should have been at least a taste of it in the basic set. If the designer wanted to limit offensiveness to maximize his audience (or feared inciting violence), then he could have limited the religion-specific mechanics to dead or "fake" religions (e.g. have wrath cards involving lightning pack more punch when played by Zeus, have Flying Spaghetti Monster bribe people with food, whatever). It's not like you'll get death threats from crazy violent Zeus followers. And as long as each religion's perks and weaknesses were somehow balanced, the basic set could have done this while still leaving room for the expansion pack.

    The game is meant to be entertaining, not incite violence.

    Of course, but it's almost so bland that the entertainment suffers. I really don't know if I'll play this game a second time. Once you've read the jokes, there isn't much left. But as you said, "it's easy to sit back and criticize," and yeah, that's all I'm doing.


    Last edited [12/29/08 11:31 AM]
 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    Red Light Cameras
    Red Light Cameras5.24.2013