alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
                                                                                                   
 
 V.18 No.18 | April 30 - May 6, 2009 

Newscity

Cement Déjà Vu

Neighbors face increased pollution from a cement transfer station—again

The storage silos at American Cement’s transfer station sit in a North Valley neighborhood.
Eric Williams
The storage silos at American Cement’s transfer station sit in a North Valley neighborhood.

One narrow street and a tall wall is all that separates Perry Key’s North Valley house from a cement transfer station.

Sometimes there is a haze on my cars, like a gray cement dust,” Key says. “I'm sure it's killed plenty of things. I don't know what it's done to us. It can’t be good for you.”

Key shot a video in June of last year (viewable on this page) that shows cement dust spewing out from one of the transfer station’s storage silos. “This is a daily occurrence,” Key says. “They’ll tell you this was an exceptional day, but I know it’s not because I live next door.”

Play Youtube Video
Cement dust spewing out from one of the transfer station’s storage silos is “a daily occurrence” says Perry Key.

Last month, American Cement, the company that owns the transfer station, applied for a permit with the city that would allow it to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As things stand, the facility (at 4702 Carlton NW) can move cement 11 hours a day, six days a week. If approved, the new permit would significantly increase the amount of pollution the station is allowed to emit.

The transfer station does not produce cement. It is a facility where cement comes in, usually by train, and gets loaded onto trucks for distribution. Key says he worries longer hours will mean more noise from the cement-hauling trucks. “If they’re going all the time, that will keep us up all day,” Key says. “How are we going to sleep?”

“The economy is hitting everybody. What we want to be able to do is be flexible.”

Grupo Cementos’ environmental and process manager, Doug Roark

With the permit it has now, the transfer station can release up to 3.9 tons of total suspended particulates—essentially, cement dust—per year into the air. If an extension were granted, that number would jump to 18.81 tons every year. The emissions allowed under the new permit would still fall within state and federal air quality standards.

American Cement’s pollution calculations assume that 99.95 percent of all particulate matter is caught by the company’s filtration equipment. (The cartridges used by American Cement are backed by a guarantee that promises 99.95 percent of emissions will be captured before they enter the air.)

Play Youtube Video
 

Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua bought American Cement in January 2008. In the spring of last year, American Cement withdrew a similar permit request that would have increased operating hours and pollution at the transfer station. Grupo Cementos’ environmental and process manager, Doug Roark, says the application was not yanked because of neighborhood outcry. “Having just acquired American Cement, we wanted to pull the permit and make sure that it was aligned with our business strategies and the direction that we wanted to go,” Roark says.

After close examination, Roark says increasing hours and cement through-traffic will help Grupo Cementos stay competitive. “The economy is hitting everybody,” Roark says. “What we want to be able to do is be flexible.”

Roark says there are jobs that require a cement transfer facility to be open at odd hours or on the weekend. Grupo Cementos wants to be able to bid on those projects without the hindrance of an 11-hour workday, he adds. “It's not that we plan to start operating 24-hours the day we get the permit,” Roark says. “That’s going to be on an exception basis.”

Play Youtube Video
 

Roark says he and other Grupo Cementos staff members plan to meet with worried neighbors in the hopes of easing their qualms. “Our core strategy is to be transparent, work with these neighborhood groups and listen to everything they have to say,” Roark says. “We're going to be good business partners with the community. We'll take all their input and concerns to heart.”

Last year, close to 70 neighborhood residents voiced their opposition to the permit request at a public hearing. Some complained about cement dust getting in their trees or on their cars. Many also mentioned the noise and traffic caused by the trucks driving to and from the facility. The city’s environmental engineering manager, Israel Tavarez, says he expects another hearing will be scheduled for the new permit request.

“For the sake of our children and the children at La Luz, I hope the permit isn’t accepted.”

David Rubin, owner of the Mountain Mahogany Community School property

As of Monday, April 20, the division received one comment from the public on the new application. A hearing may not be scheduled if there isn’t significant interest expressed by residents.

Pages of complaints were recorded by the division during last year’s meeting. Tavarez says Air Quality will speak with the city’s legal department to discuss whether those complaints will be factored into the decision on the new permit.

The cement transfer station is three blocks from Mountain Mahogany Community School and two from La Luz Elementary. David Rubin, who owns the Mountain Mahogany property, says the permit should be denied. “For the sake of our children and the children at La Luz, I hope the permit isn’t accepted,” Rubin says. “I also hope they don’t keep re-applying.”

State Sen. Dede Feldman, who represents the North Valley, says residents don’t have the technical expertise to judge whether the increased pollution poses a threat to their health. “That's something that is a real concern to me," says Feldman. Her constituents “don't have the lobbyists and the lawyers that American Cement seems to have."

The longtime legislator says the Air Quality Division should hire an independent consultant to double-check American Cement’s emission calculations. Feldman says she plans to write a letter to the division asking for a public hearing to discuss the proposed permit change. “The residents in the area need some help from a non-biased third party,” Feldman says. “We would hope that that would be the role of the local government.”

Tell the city what you think about the new permit or request a public hearing by writing to: Air Quality Division, Air Quality Services, P.O. Box 1293, Albuquerque, N.M., 87103. All comments must be postmarked by Thursday, May 7. You can also submit your opinions by calling 311, the city’s information line.

Public Comments (3)
  • The Air Quality hearing is tonight (June 23)  [ Tue Jun 23 2009 2:01 PM ]

    6:00 pm Albuquerque Convention Center (West Building), Picuris and Sandia Rooms, Basement Level

  • Half a hearing  [ Wed Jun 24 2009 8:44 AM ]

    It was scheduled to run through 9:00 pm. The hearing officer explained the rules: 5 minutes per person, and he would make sure things stayed relevant.

    Then the president of GCC droned on for not just a little over 5 minutes, but 45 minutes of completely irrelevant stuff -- like you need to see a continental map of all their operations, read a feel-good statement of the company's "vision", etc in order to understand this one transfer station's emissions. I guess if there had been an abundance of time available, this wouldn't have been so bad, but if I were a hearing officer trying to get the job done in 3 hours, I don't think I would have allowed such a delay.

    Other GCC testimony (some of it relevant, some not, but overall much better than the president's speech) went on until 7:30 before questions started. If the hearing officer had kept them on topic, maybe their 90 minutes could have been condensed down to 30.

    There was going to be a rest break during or before (I don't remember which) the questions, but the crowd was so frustrated by the delays that it was skipped. But even so, by 9:00 nobody other than GCC/American Cenent had been able to testify -- no witnesses to the effects of the current (not the proposed increased) impact, no independent scientists, not even the government people (other than answering some questions). When the previously-announced end time came, many people, some who had signed up to testify, had to leave.

    If there was any after-hours testimony, I (and a bunch of other people) missed it.

    Air Quality is going to have to schedule the second half of the hearing if they intend to make an informed decision.


    Last edited [6/24/09 8:46 AM]
  • the other half won't happen...  [ Wed Jun 24 2009 11:04 AM ]

    ...and if it does, it will go pretty much the same way.

    In my experience, this is how ALL "public discussions" go in our government: the money gets to speak as long as they want, saying whatever they want, dragging along the meeting at a less-than-snail's pace all in hopes of frustrating the opponents to the point that they leave or flip out, thus portraying them as flakes or nutjobs.

    I attended a county zoning hearing that gave unlimited time to a developer's lawyer that didn't even know the particulars of the planned development. He contradicted himself and the proposal several times, all the while making references to safety concerns as "fringe hysteria". We had documented proof that the location is the site of no less than a half dozen major accidents A YEAR, along with a statement from the head County safety officer (don't remember the exact title) declaring strong opposition to the project.

    At least a dozen adjacent residents (including two that have had to replace their fence 6 or more times because of accidents) spoke against the project, as well as the "residents" of the property with their sob story of how their 3000+ square foot home wasn't big enough for their family of five, so they needed to build four more houses on the property.

    Numerous limitations were placed on ANY opposing voice that wished to speak, while the (only) two pro-development speakers did whatever they wanted (including misrepresenting the proposal on the written motion, only to have one or more of the zoning commission members tell them how to correct it so it would be approved) .

    Needless to say the zoning reclassification and development was approved, although since the economy tanked, the family's "urgent need for more space" has miraculously subsided. The approval to completely change their zoning status could easily have increased the property's value four times over. The proposed homes will require a NEW cul de sac at an S curve that again, boasts at least 6 rollover-type accidents a year.

    All that matters when it comes to industry vs. residents is that industry has the foresight (and money) to get those making the decisions in their pockets first. Safety and public health ALWAYS take a back seat to the greater good, because money is king and people are expendable.

    [a great example][link][/a great example]


    Last edited [6/24/09 11:07 AM]
 
Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
 

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • alibi.com
  • Latest Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Latest User Posts
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Most Active Users
  • Web Exclusives
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
    the Bash @ Burt's
    the Bash @ Burt's6.15.2013