alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
 V.19 No.47 | November 25 - December 1, 2010 

Letters

Feel Like Makin’ Love

Dear Alibi,

Thank you so much for including me in your article about Albuquerque Etsy shops [Feature, “Etsy-Querque,” Nov. 18-24]. I have enjoyed the Alibi for so many years. I really appreciate your time and consideration. Etsy has been a great venue for me to sell my hand-knitted items in addition to local arts/crafts shows. It is a great community of hand-creators.

Deb Salazar

knottyknittershop.etsy.com

Public Comments
     

    Political Indigestion

    Dear Alibi,

    I read David D. David’s column on the topic of Susana Martinez [Opinion, “The Liberal Shades of Our New Guv,” Nov. 11-17] with great interest only to find that, after doing so, I had severe indigestion. It isn’t often that I read political commentary, mostly because, like eating a ream of cotton candy, the content is stimulating but lacking in any real nutrition. I decided to take a chance with Mr. David’s column because I was genuinely curious to see if it was going to actually offer me meaningful political discourse. Unfortunately, it did not. Instead of making a case for changing my opinion of Gov-elect Martinez, the column offered a couple of bland facts about her past while simultaneously rubbing the reader’s face in her victory much like a drunken sports fan might do after the Super Bowl when their team has won. Is this really where we want our political discussion to go?

    I’m sorely disappointed in the Alibi’s choice to run this column, though I do applaud your decision to at least give some face time to the other side. Despite that, it still saddens me that we have to go through this ridiculous cheerleading every election cycle as fans of each team keep close track of the scores, repeat content-less banter without considering what it even means and watch the opposing fan’s faces to see if they can spot tears when the results come in.

    Mr. David might respond that it was indeed the opposing team that started the name-calling, or at least continues to propagate it, but that would betray potentially willful ignorance of the point I’m trying to make. Politics should be about reasoned, fact-based discussion, not about name-calling, cheerleading and overzealous dedication to one’s team. Claims should be supported with more than rhetoric and anger, and should at least have some manner of precedent or data as their foundation. Until that actually happens and people earnestly begin to educate themselves about the issues beyond the 10-second sound bites, then we are never going to make much progress at all.

    In closing, bravo Mr. David, you have successfully kept the bar on political discussion as low as ever. Good luck in the 2012 Election Bowl!

    Phillip W. Baker Ph.D.

    UNM FlyBase/VectorBase

    Public Comments (3)
    • "The Ol' Ball Game"  [ Sun Nov 28 2010 11:51 PM ]

      "The Ol' Ball Game" [ Sat Nov 27 2010 4:16 PM ]

      I couldn't agree with you more, Dr. Baker. Concerning politics, dialectical discourse in this country is incredibly hard to find at any level--federal, state, or local. This is certainly not a new problem; it is a problem as old as democracy.

      I often wonder how those of us who are disinterested in taking a particular side--by which I mean we do not have a vested interest in believing a particular side, financial or otherwise, but rather want to get to the bottom of the issues--could hope to raise the bar in political discourse. I invite you to disagree with me on this, because I would love to be wrong in this case, but I believe the problem lies with the masses of voters. They are not sufficiently educated, nor are they trained to recognize the non-arguments employed by political propagandists each election season. Like Willie Stark in Warren's All the King's Men, politicians who overestimate the intelligence of the voters by discussing the nuts and bolts of their policies will soon lose their followers to their demagogical opponents.

      Sadly, this danger is all too real for journalists, as well. Journalism is a business like any other, and as such relies upon the bulk of its consumers, in this case the readers. Unfortunately, conflict and colorful rhetoric sell as well as sex, while facts and data are soporific. Our world is steadily becoming a Bradburyian nightmare in which words exceeding three syllables are useful for nothing other than ostentation, information of substance can only be delivered if it is a concomitant of entertainment, and anyone who aspires to escape the mold cast for him will contend with brutal normative forces.

      My theory is that if this trend can be reversed, one crucial device toward this end will be the reintroduction of the study of philosophy into public education. After all, so much of a person's political beliefs are merely an outgrowth of his philosophical views. How can we be in accord over what would be for the greater good of our society if we cannot be in agreement over the basic philosophical question "what is good?" What immunity to propaganda can people be said to have if they cannot differentiate a valid, logical argument from an empty non-argument? If the voters' political beliefs are based entirely on unchallenged assumptions transmitted to them by the media, religion, teachers, their families, and their peers, the future would appear very dim, at least insofar as it depends upon democratic processes.

      In essence, for far too long American children have been taught what to think rather than how to think, and the course to correction will not occur overnight. The way I see it, the relatively perspicacious among us can either brainstorm the solutions to this problem, or choose a side, buy an air horn and a foam finger, and scream our heads off at one another at the "ol' ball game" of American politics. If it can rightly be said that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, we will almost certainly opt for the latter.


      Last edited [11/28/10 11:58 PM]
    • "Everybody wants ta get into th' act!"  [ Tue Dec 7 2010 7:18 AM ]

      I was intrigued by the annotation "UNM FlyBase/VectorBase" after Phillip W. Baker Ph.D.'s signature and discovered, thanks to The National Center for Biomedical Ontology ([link])that VectorBase is one of eight Bioinformatics Resource Centers funded by NIAID to provide web-based resources to scientific community conducting basic and applied research on organisms considered potential agents of biowarfare or bioterrorism or causing emerging or re-emerging diseases, while the FlyBase project is carried out by a consortium of Drosophila (a genus of small flies, belonging to the family Drosophilidae, whose members are often called "fruit flies") researchers and computer scientists at: Harvard University, University of Cambridge (UK), Indiana University and the University of New Mexico. In any case a Google search returns zip for this individual and as Marie Curie once observed: “there are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors instead of establishing the truth" ...which is also a characteristic of pissants (in of course a social rather then entomological context).


      Last edited [12/7/10 7:27 AM]
    • Ad Hominem  [ Tue Dec 7 2010 8:49 AM ]

      Ad hominem, Dr. Sax. Ad hominem.

     

    Editor's Note: We're not sure which team you think David D. David bats for, but we're pretty sure he swings both ways. —Marisa Demarco

    Public Comments
       

      Breakin’ the Law

      Dear Alibi,

      Regarding Don McIver's letter on bicycles and stop signs [“Bikers Beware,” Nov. 11-17], this has been dealt with rationally by saner authorities. Idaho, for instance, has a model law in which bicycles must slow down only to yield-sign speed and then may proceed. This is a reasonable compromise—how good politics is done. The statute and details are easily searchable (Idaho bike/bicycle law). I'd like to see local bike groups push for this; otherwise cyclists are subject to foolish harassment as Mr. McIver elaborated.

      Relatedly, it's darker earlier now and I'm seeing some nearly invisible cyclists without lights or reflectors. My question is: Do you really want to die young (and stupidly)?

      Peter B. Ives

      Public Comments
         

        Bill’s Ego

        Dear Alibi,

        I wish Ms. Martinez luck in solving our state's many problems (and hope she will support Rail Runner and other forms of transportation). However, I believe that Ms. Denish could have won the election if Gov. Richardson had put aside his ego and given her information and a few chances to show what she could do. Unless he feared indictment, he should have stepped aside months before the election to benefit his party.

        Phil Bock

        Public Comments
           

          A Day of Mourning

          Dear Alibi,

          Another of the United States' national holidays is about to arrive. I call it Un-thanksgiving Day.

          The image of the holiday is Anglo "pilgrims" sharing a meal with Native Americans—that was the beginning of white European people stealing the land, slaughtering most of the Native Americans and putting the few survivors on "reservations" (essentially “prisons”).

          Native Americans wisely don't celebrate "Thanks"-giving. It is the National Day of Mourning—a reminder of the massive killing and continued suffering of the Native Americans, who lost their peace and freedom on their own land long ago.

          David Lee Bennett

          Benbrook, Texas

          Public Comments
             

            More Like “Bad Christianity”

            Dear Alibi,

            [Music, “There’s a Ph.D. in the Mosh Pit,” Nov. 11-17] Personally, I outgrew punk rock when I outgrew high school. I couldn't find enough in the stark minimalism of punk to keep me interested beyond that, especially knowing there was a vast world of music beyond it to explore. One could argue that I was never a true punk fan, and I would probably agree in order to end the boring discussion as quickly as possible.

            My sister and I were dining at Frontier the night of the Bad Religion show, when 20 to 30 punkish people began trickling in with their T-shirts, patches and buttons. I saw the logo, which featured a Christian cross in a red circle crossed out. I am familiar with the sophomoric premise of Bad Religion's ideology, and I understand the line of thinking. I would personally cite economics as the reason for the world's strife and turmoil, with ideology (usually created by wrenching a religious premise out of context) tacked on as a rider to justify wars and oppression. The real culprit for human conflict is the scarcity of resources.

            This is a digression, however. On to the kernel: What struck me as amusing was that the cross was the targeted symbol for the band's logo, while there are plenty other major religions at which to throw stones. I've studied enough sociology to understand the reason for this singling out of Christianity. It is, after all, the dominant religion of the Western hemisphere, and as the Western hemisphere has enjoyed global hegemony for several centuries, it's a case of the underdog cornered by the wolf.

            However, with a wry smile I noted mentally that Muslim iconography was strikingly absent from the band's logo. Now why would this be? After all, Islam overtook Christianity in the ’90s as the world's most popular religion. Christians are easier targets, I suppose, for their proclivity to be relatively permissive of criticism. After all, a tenant of Christianity is that persecution should be suffered willingly and patiently, while retaliation is discouraged. How much spine does it take to slap someone who is taught to "turn the other cheek"?

            What I used to admire about punk rock was its boldness. It had an in-your-face willingness to say what everyone else is afraid to say. Yet, I see Bad Religion still tiptoeing very obviously around the world's most popular religion by leaving it off of its merchandise. Why don't they just change the name to Bad Christianity?

            That's my two bits. I'll leave the exorbitant price of admission ($23 dollars for a punk show?!?!?) out of it.

            sisterimapoet

            Comment from alibi.com

            Public Comments (3)
            • Probably already mentioned ten times  [ Thu Nov 25 2010 12:19 AM ]

              I'm sure this has already been mentioned but: A) Where did you get your information that Islam overtook Christianity back in the 90's? All I could find from 2007 was that Christianity was still reigning supreme. B)Using your argument, that Islam over took Christianity in the 90's, how does that alter the bands name in any way? Back in 1979 when the band was formed-for those who can't count-11 to 21 years before the "take over" Christianity was still supposedly on top. Seems to be a good target eh? C) How many major bands, who are still together, change their original name a decade or more later? D) Stop using words like proclivity unless it genuinely went from brain to fingers without you looking it up.


              Last edited [11/25/10 12:39 AM]
            • Dearest Detractor:  [ Fri Nov 26 2010 3:28 PM ]

              Hi Stroso:

              Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. I stand corrected about the number of adherents to Christianity versus the number of adherents to Islam. I seem to have misconstrued a statistic I heard that Islam was the fastest growing religion in the world, thinking instead that this meant it enjoyed numerical superiority. Thank you for pointing out this error. However, I don't feel this nullifies the point I made, particularly because Islam is the world's fastest growing religion, and if current growth trends continue, it will soon be the world's most popular religion. As such, its absence is indeed quite conspicuous in an anti-religious conversation.

              As to points B and C which you brought up, I think you may have missed the rhetorical tone of what I was saying. I wasn't honestly suggesting the band change its name. I was only pointing out what I perceived to be an inconsistency between its logo, its merchandising, and its stated creed, which is opposition to religion in all forms. The band's logo clearly attacks Christianity, while all other religions are left out, most strikingly Islam. I wonder if we could argue from silence that the band is afraid to extend its assault to Islam because to do so would be controversial, especially in light of the present-day political ramifications. If that is the case, I would find such timidity to be woefully inconsistent with all that I used to like about punk rock. The band could at least update its merchandise.

              As to the final point, in which you seem to accuse me of being overly verbose, I will let Morrissey defend me: "In the daily scheme of things, people's language is so frighteningly limited, and if you use a word with more than 10 letters it's absolute snobbery." I did not use a dictionary to compose my writ. My writing style is authentic. May I suggest that you sound a bit like an anti-intellectual populist when you criticize another's writing for "having too many of them big words"? You should instead thank me for regaling you with a rare treat--a lavishly well-written comment--regardless whether you agree with the argument contained within it.

            • Bad Religion = Highly Marketable  [ Sun Nov 28 2010 9:02 PM ]

              There seems to have been a lot of misunderstanding about my criticism of Bad Religion. I'll review just to be 100% clear.

              Bad Religion seems to me to be a cowardly band in a genre that is supposed to be an in-your-face, say-whatever-needs-to-be-said genre. I say this because it is still restricting the religions attacked in its logo to Christianity, while Islam, as the fastest-growing religion in the world, is completely left out. I cannot say for certain, but it would seem they avoid it because the political Left in America is decidedly for the acceptance and understanding of Islam (and justifiably so), and the political Left happens to be among Bad Religion's target demographics. An Islamic icon in a red circle crossed out would be too controversial for the band to tackle, although it claims to be against religion in all forms. Accordingly, I see an inconsistency between the band's creed and its marketing.

              It seems to me the band is more interested in selling albums than speaking out for its beliefs. After all, a Christian cross in a red circle crossed out can't possibly hurt the band's album and merchandise sales; if anything, it helps them. Exploiting the Christian symbol for album sales draws in the dough from rebellious children reared on Judeo-Christian values--a key demographic for the sale of punk rock albums. In this way, Bad Religion's assault on the Christian icon is not unlike the album-selling tactics of such schlockly shock rockers as Disturbed. It's all about getting money from the rebellious kids, who probably got the money from their Christian parents as an allowance.

             

            Diagnosis Hopeful

            Dear Alibi,

            Enjoyed your article in highlighting the fact that diabetes type II is very much overlooked in the media [Opinion, “Insulin Shock,” Nov. 4-10]. It's not a fancy or flashy disease as some of the infectious disease you mentioned. I applaud you for spotlighting this major health problem.

            I personally do not have diabetes, but have loved ones who do have it and instead of seeing your article as a blame game, I rather see it as hopeful. It is hopeful in the sense that unlike some diseases, those with impaired fasting glucose (aka pre-diabetes) can actually stop its progression into full-blown diabetes. I don't know about you, but that leaves me hopeful in that I can actually change the outcome. If one does indeed progress to full diabetes, then one still has hope in turning things around by changing lifestyles and eating right.

            That's how I saw your article, as a fun resource with facts and truths throughout. The hope is in the details.

            ricachica

            Comment from alibi.com

            Letters should be sent with the writer’s name, address and daytime phone number via e-mail to letters@alibi.com. They can also be faxed to (505) 256-9651. Letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may be published in any medium; we regret that owing to the volume of correspondence we cannot reply to every letter. Word count limit for letters is 300 words.
            Public Comments
               
              Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
               

              • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
              • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
              • alibi.com
              • Latest Posts
              • Most Active Stories
              • Latest User Posts
              • Highest-Rated Posts
              • Most Active Users
              • Web Exclusives
              • Latest User Blogs
              • Latest Chowtown Reviews
              • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
              • Recent Classifieds
              • This Week's Alibi Picks
              • Albuquerque
              • Duke City Fix
              • Albuquerque Beer Scene
              • What's Wrong With This Picture?
              • Reddit Albuquerque
              • ABQ Journal Metro
              • ABQrising
              • ABQ Journal Latest News
              • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
              • NM and the West
              • New Mexico FBIHOP
              • Democracy for New Mexico
              • Only in New Mexico
              • Mario Burgos
              • Democracy for New Mexico
              • High Country News
              • El Grito
              • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
              • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
              • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
              • Slashdot
              • Freedom to Tinker
              • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
                "The Best is Yet to Come"
                "The Best is Yet to Come"6.23.2013