alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 V.20 No.45 | November 10 - 16, 2011 

Occupy the Alibi

Systemic Risk?

Nah, it’s those kids in the park that are really dangerous

I’ll get to the $235 trillion in a minute. First, a few words on my arrest.

Around 11:30 p.m. on Oct. 25, I was arrested while protesting the University of New Mexico's decision to revoke (Un)occupy Albuquerque’s permit and evict its camp. Thirty-seven people were arrested that night. Most were sitting in a circle in Yale Park, chanting and singing as the cops moved in on us.

A short epigraph scrawled in Sharpie on the sidewalk in front of the Olympia Café—right across the street from Yale Park—commemorates the night. It reads “I was batoned by a riot squad right here. I am a woman. I am poor.” It’s signed “AGC” and dated 10/26/11, presumably because it happened after midnight.

I was only in custody for about 12 hours and am awaiting arraignment on a criminal trespass charge. We were transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center, where most of us were booked and released almost immediately.

“Exposure” is an appropriate term attached to these contracts; there’s a possibility the banks could lose these bets.

I can’t pretend this was a huge sacrifice on my part. But I can certainly object to these arrests and those happening at Occupy camps across the country. They represent an attempt by the government to stifle freedom of expression.

My outrage over this and UNM's reaction to the homeless population prompted me to stand my ground in the park, but each of us did it for our own reasons. The nationwide protests, similarly, consist of individual people with wildly diverse reasons for demonstrating. But one common theme is anger at big banks.

Which brings us to the $235 trillion.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency— a federal agency that supervises national banks—just released a quarterly report detailing the risk being taken by major banks. Four of them—JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America—account for 94.4 percent of the financial system’s bet-making, adding up to $235 trillion between these four banks.

I’d like to emphasize that’s “trillion” with a T. As in: one million millions.

They don’t call it gambling. They call it " outstanding derivatives exposure."

There are many types of these contracts, and they are too complicated to fully understand without devoting years to the study of modern investment banking. The important thing to remember, though, is that derivatives contracts do not represent real-world holdings. They’re not real money. If you buy an oil-based derivative, you are not actually buying any oil. You are simply placing a bet, short or long, on the future price of oil.

“Exposure” is an appropriate term attached to these contracts; there’s a possibility the banks could lose these bets.

The derivatives market is so similar to a casino that Congress, with the backing of the financial industry, actually passed a law in 2000 barring states from regulating derivatives as gambling. This same law, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, prevented derivatives from being regulated as securities. So they are essentially completely unregulated. Frighteningly, banks are not required to set aside any money at all to pay off these bets in case of a loss.

Way back in 2002, megabillionaire Warren Buffett famously called derivatives “financial weapons of mass destruction,” a description that was proven accurate during the financial crisis of 2008. Derivatives instruments known as credit default swaps were a central cause (if not the central cause) of the 2008 financial crisis, causing meltdowns everywhere from AIG to the entire nation of Greece.

The total size of the resulting bailout (so far) is estimated at about $12.2 trillion, about 5 percent of the derivative exposure—$235 trillion—of the aforementioned banks.

I’d like to emphasize that’s “trillion” with a T. As in: one million millions.

The entire GDP of the United States last year was about $14.5 trillion—about one-sixteenth of those contracts.

Or think about it like this: The population of the entire world hit 7 billion on Halloween. If that $235 trillion was real money and it was distributed equally among everyone on Earth, we would each get more than $33,500.

The potential for a repeat 2008-style meltdown—and corresponding bailout—is enormous. Bank of America, for example, is already moving a large part of its derivatives to the corporation’s bank holding company, meaning losses are insured by the FDIC—you and me as taxpayers.

Consider these things the next time you hear a public official talk about cutting funding to Social Security or the school system. When the senator from Arizona starts whining about how much money undocumented immigrants are costing us, give some thought to how you feel about covering $235 trillion in big banks’ gambling debts.

Too big to fail? I say the derivatives market is too big to allow. Which is precisely why we must continue to occupy Wall Street and everywhere else these banks show their faces—regardless of whether we’re granted the proper permit.

Andrew Beale is a participant in (Un)occupy Albuquerque, but he does not speak on behalf of the movement.

The views expressed are solely those of the author.
Public Comments (2)
  • Gambling  [ Sat Nov 19 2011 1:42 AM ]

    First of all, Goldman Sachs is NOT a bank - it is an investment firm. Like a bank, but not quite. Second, I find it beyond ironic that you hold nobody in the White House responsible for all of this - in fact, you never mention the President or his crony capitalist thugs at all. You never mention Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson, who oversaw the implementation of TARP under Obama's Department of Treasury - $10 billion of which went to GS. You call yourself a taxpayer - what kind of taxes do you pay? Sales? I believe it. Property? directly or indirectly, sure. Income? Doubt it, unless your rich.

    Look Andrew, TARP was wrong. Many of my fellow conservatives agree with you. But not Your Savior Obama - he voted for it and implemented it, with help of course from his predecessor-in-cronyism, the hated Bush. Ultimately, I think its time to pull that hopeandchange bumper sticker off your Prius or bicycle or whatever you drive and face the ugly truth, sir - occupying Yale park, a place with NO CONNECTION to Wall Street, will not solve this problem! The occupying needs to be at the White House, or the Round House, Santa Fe, DC - where the cronies are, where the Federal Reserve is, where the true power lies - but you won't! And finally, my thought for you... Stop wasting your energy getting arrested for NOTHING and get off the grass (park grass - Im not an old hippie) and do something about it. Pool your resources to convince others to join Credit Unions, to only deal with community banks (the ones still around), volunteer at a homeless shelter, or just spread awareness wherever you go - but make it constructive! Sleeping in a park and holding a sign all day is probably the laziest form of protest I've ever heard of, not to mention completely unoriginal and boring. But more power to you, I guess...

    Last edited [11/19/11 1:44 AM]
  • Occupy the one yer with  [ Sat Nov 19 2011 6:55 PM ]

    Maybe you missed it, outofmehead, but banks aren't banks anymore. In 1998(?) or so, the law that required banks to be safe with your money (Glass-Steagall Act) was repealed. Since then, investment firms like Goldman-Sachs have been able to put on banks' clothing and likewise banks have been able to play Hedge Fund Mania with your deposits.

    I find it odd that anyone would blame the New Depression on the occupant of the White House. There was perfect continuity of economic policy from Bush to Obama. This early 21st century period of American history will probably come to be known as the Bush-Obama administration. If we could go from a know-nothing Texas Republican to a multicultural law professor Democrat, with perfect continuity of policy -- isn't it clear that who is President is irrelevant to this discussion?

Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!

  • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; close using the little X icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
  • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
  • Latest Posts
  • Web Exclusives
  • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
  • Recent Classifieds
  • Latest User Posts
  • Most Active Stories
  • Most Active Users
  • Latest Chowtown Reviews
  • Highest-Rated Posts
  • Latest User Blogs
  • Calendar Comments
  • This Week's Alibi Picks
  • Albuquerque
  • Duke City Fix
  • Albuquerque Beer Scene
  • What's Wrong With This Picture?
  • Reddit Albuquerque
  • ABQ Journal Metro
  • ABQrising
  • ABQ Journal Latest News
  • Albuquerque
  • NM and the West
  • New Mexico FBIHOP
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • Only in New Mexico
  • Mario Burgos
  • Democracy for New Mexico
  • High Country News
  • El Grito
  • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
  • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
  • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
  • Slashdot
  • Freedom to Tinker
  • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.