alibi online

Free Will AstrologyAlibi's Personals
 
 V.17 No.20 | May 15 - 21, 2008 

Letters

Green as Gold

Dear Alibi,

To all who are concerned with our burgeoning environmental problems and the direction our city is heading, now is the time to speak up.

Recently, the Environmental Planning Commission gave into supposed neighborhood association “leaders” and shot down a proposed residential Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) project that would have transformed a parking lot in the Silver Hill neighborhood, directly south of UNM, into a green residential building. (About 35 neighbors opposed the project from a neighborhood population of more than 1,750 residents.)

The fact is that we are on the verge of a huge environmental crisis, and this project takes a giant step forward in addressing some of these problems. The 2000 Gold Project is a well-thought-out, responsible infill project that combats Albuquerque’s endless sprawl.

One objection of some of the Silver Hill neighbors is that since the site abuts a historic district, the proposed project will destroy the character of the area. As the site is now a parking lot, no historic homes will be torn down. Quite the contrary—this project will enhance the neighborhood by integrating the old with the new, revitalizing an area that could really use it.

This proposed building is only four floors! In a neighborhood of one, two and three floors, four isn’t out of scale or too big ... it’s perfect for the area.

Please contact Rick Goldman of Sheffield Partners (rick@sheffieldpartners.com) for more information, and contact the city councilors (www.cabq.gov/council) and let them know you are in favor of the appeal for the 2000 Gold Project (#1006822).

Christopher Lucas

Silver Hill Neighborhood Association Member

Public Comments (4)
  • There's more to this story...  [ Wed May 21 2008 6:14 PM ]

    What you're omitting, Chris, are some very important points about the development at 2000 Gold, which people should consider.

    1) The neighborhood associations actually worked with Mr. Goldman for several weeks and at least three meetings which I personally attended to try and come up with a compromise plan that would allow the project to go forward with support from the neighborhoods. However Mr. Goldman was unwilling to compromise.

    2) The building actually doesn't fit on the lot. Mr. Goldman wanted the City to give up public right of way in order to let him build his development. Right of way equal to a 10% increase in the size of his lot. Why could he not design a project that fits on the land he actually owns, and meets city zoning codes?

    3) The 4 story size of the project is dictated by economics and a desire for profit, not by a desire to help increase density or help the City fight an environmental crisis. If Mr. Goldman hadn't used the existing parking lot to meet legally required spaces for his development at 2001 Gold, he likely wouldn't need to build a 4 story building to maintain those parking spaces and still be able to fit new housing and new parking for that housing on the site.

    4) While you cite a supposedly small number of people in opposition, there were an even smaller number of people in support of the project, and many (though not all) of the supporters were people who either live in one of Mr. Goldman's current developments, or work in real estate and are likely to benefit from the project.

    Everyone opposing the project from the neighborhoods supports infill, and smart development for Albuquerque. They just don't support trying to use good concepts to greenwash a proposal that has a lot of legitimate problems, which the developer refuses to address.

    To anyone reading this comment, please urge your City Council members to look at the facts of the case, and not high dollar development using buzzwords and now appealing to the media as a sales tactic.

    Ben Roberts

    University Heights NA President, 2008

  • Correction to my previous comment  [ Wed May 28 2008 10:48 AM ]

    I've been reminded that at this point in the appeal process, City Councillors cannot take input from the public, they can only review information and comment received up until the EPC decision. So any comment on this matter will be placed on file but will not be read or used to decide the appeal.

  • "Green as Gold" Biased and Misleading Letter  [ Fri May 30 2008 7:27 AM ]

    Realtor Creates Problem for The Alibi and Councilors’ Office:

    Biased Letter Contains Misinformation

    May 25, 2008

    Dear Editor:

    When I attempted to respond to the City Council to voice my opposition to a letter from Chris Lucas published in a recent issue of the Alibi, I received the following curt response from a City Councilor’s Policy Analyst:

    Mr. Mayer,

    While we appreciate hearing from you, Councilor Benton and the other city councilors are not allowed to receive communication on pending appeals, which are considered quasi-judicial matters. I have forwarded your email to Crystal Ortega, Clerk of the Council, who will note receipt of the email and place a copy of it in the official case file; however, it will not be distributed to councilors. I am also contacting the Alibi to ask them to print a clarification about this issue.

    Should you have any questions about the appeals process, please feel free to contact one of the senior members of the Council staff - Bruce Thompson, Senior Policy Analyst (bthompson@cabq.gov), or Laura Mason, Director of Council Services (lmason@cabq.gov).

    Best regards,

    ------------------------------​----------------------------------------​------------------

    Kara Shair-Rosenfield

    Policy Analyst - City Councilor Isaac Benton, District 3

    Albuquerque City Council

    tel: 505.768.3186

    fax: 505.768.3227

    email: karasr@cabq.gov

    The provocative letter of Chris Lucus that ran in the Alibi follows:

    Green as Gold

    [link]

    By the way, I came upon the fact that Mr. Lucas is a Realtor. Numerous members of my Neighborhood Association know him as one. You can Google or AOL search his name (for the Albuquerque area) and locate some links connecting him to his real estate adventures. Moreover, it is well know around the neighborhoods that Chris utilizes the unethical and sociopathic practice of spinning facts and statistics, in real estate/developer lingo as in his original letter to you, only to suit his special interests and collusive relationships.

    I appreciate your attention to this matter,

    Sam Mayer, 1701 Silver Ave SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106

    (505) 247-8296

  • MORON: "Green as Gold " Letter  [ Fri May 30 2008 8:04 AM ]

    Friday, May 16, 2008

    Letters To the Editor

    Blame Victims of Dense Infill

    THE CONDO project at 2000 Gold is another attempt by out of state, larger-city developers to bully their way into growing towns like Albuquerque. Their failed attempts elsewhere should not be introduced here. ...

    There are, hopefully, some zoning regulations that should be enforced without blaming the neighborhoods for being the bad guys. ... I know our City Council will see through all their shenanigans.

    Albuquerque has always been a “green” friendly place. That's even before the notion of being “green” was heard of or taken over by politics and profiteers. One thing is certain though, if any developer runs into budget constraints, the first thing to go is the green-friendly and other perky things.

    The developers of 2000 Gold should be free to build their great facility in another location — perhaps where it is needed and wanted. Albuquerque and its neighborhoods want development but in the terms established by laws and statutes.

    Luckily, the Environmental Planning Commission has denied the requests of the 2000 Gold project. The attempts of the developers to sway public opinion, the mayor, the City Council, or anyone else in the process have not gone unnoticed, as well as not being appreciated or convincing. ...

    SAM MAYER

    Albuquerque

 

Shakespeare was [W]right Again

Dear Alibi,

As the "Cruelest Month" closes, the "nationalized" press corp is ordered to manufacture a tarmac dispute between Obama and Clinton as to who is the father of French impressionism, Manet or Monet, while McCain stands, wobbly-kneed, watching Nascar and eating ribs.

Meanwhile, Rev. Wright (Iago without a soliloquy) munches on the bones of the next generation. Over at Castle Clinton, Bill slips out to the heath for a dalliance with the Three Witches. Returning home, he offers Hillary a drink. Will it be a potent potion or a poisoned chalice? Only time will tell who shall slay the tyrant Macbeth.

Richard Wolfson

Albuquerque

Public Comments
     

    Who's the Hypocrite?

    Dear Alibi,

    I am writing in response to Jim Scarantino's pitiful right-wing attack on the citizens of the Galisteo Basin [Re: The Real Side, “The City Hypocritical," April 24-30]. In this desperate move to justify oil exploration within a watershed that serves more than 15,000 people, Scarantino calls us hypocrites and talks about us as "many of the anti-oil activists live around the Galisteo Basin." I have to first pose the question: How many people have you actually spoken with and how many homes did you visit? Personally, not unlike many in my neighborhood of the foothills of the Ortiz Mountains, I designed and built my own solar-heated home. I hand-built the 10,000 gallons of catchment systems in my yard. I buy my electricity from PNM's wind energy program and pay a higher rate for it. Many people out here work at home, as I and my wife do, so we do not commute.

    I have to wonder, as Tecton has its eyes on the Albuquerque area of the Rio Grande, will Scarantino invite them to place an exploration rig in his backyard? What if we put his water at risk? He believes it is risk-free and yet there is not one frack drilling operation to date with a clean record anywhere in the world, only Tecton's claim that "now it is safe." Furthermore, the most oil that (may) be here, according to Tecton, is a two- to four-day supply for the U.S., which would be extracted over a 25- to 40-year operation! That is about one-tenth of a day for the U.S. each year. In his mind, that is worth risking our lives, our health, the watershed, the environment, and the impact of noise and other pollution on Santa Fe County and property values.

    In short time, the Alibi and Scarantino will have to answer to the many advertisers and readers who are themselves trying to move to a "greener" market, a "greener" lifestyle. Should the Alibi continue with such writing, such archaic thinking, it—like oil and gas—will have to submit to becoming a dinosaur of sorts. As a citizen of the Galisteo Basin, I implore the Alibi to support writers and ideas that can move us forward into a bright future and away from this dark-mindedness.

    Michael Lancaster

    Cerrillos, N.M.

    Public Comments
       

      CORRECTION: In last week’s Summer Guide [Re: Feature, May 8-14], the wrong e-mail address was listed in the contact information for the bicycle poker ride. The correct address is johnsanch@gmail.com.

      Letters should be sent with the writer’s name, address and daytime phone number via e-mail to letters@alibi.com. They can also be faxed to (505) 256-9651. Letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may be published in any medium; we regret that owing to the volume of correspondence we cannot reply to every letter.

      Public Comments
         
        Join our mailing list for exclusive info, the week's events and free stuff!
         

        • Select sidebar boxes to add below. You can also click and drag to rearrange the boxes; minimize, maximize and close using the little icons on each box. To re-add a box you closed, return to this menu.
        • Because you are not logged in, any changes you make to these boxes will vanish as soon as you click to another page. If you log in, the boxes will stick.
        • alibi.com
        • Latest Posts
        • Most Active Stories
        • Latest User Posts
        • Highest-Rated Posts
        • Most Active Users
        • Web Exclusives
        • Latest User Blogs
        • Latest Chowtown Reviews
        • Recent Rocksquawk Discussions
        • Recent Classifieds
        • This Week's Alibi Picks
        • Albuquerque
        • Duke City Fix
        • Albuquerque Beer Scene
        • What's Wrong With This Picture?
        • Reddit Albuquerque
        • ABQ Journal Metro
        • ABQrising
        • ABQ Journal Latest News
        • Del.icio.us Albuquerque
        • NM and the West
        • New Mexico FBIHOP
        • Democracy for New Mexico
        • Only in New Mexico
        • Mario Burgos
        • Democracy for New Mexico
        • High Country News
        • El Grito
        • NM Politics with Joe Monahan
        • Stephen W. Terrell's Web Log
        • The Net Is Vast and Infinite
        • Slashdot
        • Freedom to Tinker
        • Is there a feed that should be on this list? Tell us about it.
          How I Quit Crack
          How I Quit Crack5.28.2013